1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on those findings, LPA Herrera was unable to determine with certainty whether the facility was operating within or out of ratio. Therefore, although the allegation above may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 3, no deficiency is cited during today’s inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Maria Cruz De Segovia. Licensee Cruz De Segovia was provided with appeal rights. A notice of site visit (LIC 9213) was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
|