1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to the Reporting Party (RP), the licensee applied sleeping patches on a child without the parent’s consent. RP states that the parent observed the patches on two separate occasions. The RP further stated that after the first incident, the parent asked the Licensee to stop using the patches, however the parent reportedly observed the patches on the child for a second time. Per RP, the parent observed unusual sleep behaviors in the child following the use of the patches and sought medical evaluations due to these concerns.
During the interview conducted with the Licensee, the Licensee disclosed information that corroborated the above allegation. Licensee stated that she has been applying mosquito repellent patches on the children in care due to the increased presence of mosquitoes on the premises. Licensee further stated that the parents were aware, however, the Licensee was unable to provide written consent from the children’s authorized representatives.
Per S1 interview, S1 disclosed that the patches are used to prevent mosquitoes from biting children. S1 proceeded to show LPA what the patches looked like by taking out the package and stated that they usually place the patches on the back of the children’s shirts. S1 stated that some children are allergic to mosquito bites and that all parents are aware that they are using them and some parents request the patches to take home as well.
Per children’s interviews, Child #1 through Child #3 disclosed information to corroborate the above allegation. C1, C2 and C3 all stated that the patches are used for mosquitos and that they are placed on their shirts when they go outside.
Parent interviews disclosed information to corroborate the above allegation. Two out of five parents stated that they were unaware of the use of mosquito repellent patches on their children while attending the facility. The parents reported that the licensee had previously informed them that she did not administer any medication to children in care and, based on that information, they understood that no products were/are being provided or applied to their children. P1 stated that they observed unusual behaviors in their child and were not certain if it was a side effect from the use of the patches as they were unaware of what the patches were intended for. This caused concern therefore P1 sought a medical evaluation for their child. P1 and P4 stated they did not/have not provided consent or authorization for their children to use the patches. P4 further stated, “I would not lie and say the Licensee was putting something on the kids without her telling us”. |