1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the course of investigation, LPA interviewed 2 staff members, 4 parents; LPAs attempted to interview 3 children but 3 out of 3 children did not qualify to be interviewed.
Regarding the allegation, Staff forced children to nap. S1 denied forcing children to nap and stated if children can’t sleep, they can lay on their mat quietly and they fall asleep but that’s for the little kids, the older kids can sleep or not sleep. If they don’t want to sleep, they can do their homework or S1 give them things to work on. S2 denied forcing children to nap, in regard to school-age children S2 sets up the mat if they want to sleep, they can or they do their homework or do work at the tables. LPA attempted to interview 3 children, but the children did not qualify for interviews. 4 of 4 parents interviewed made no disclosures supporting the allegation.
Regarding the allegation, Staff yelled at children when they did not take a nap. S1 denied forcing children to nap and stated if children can’t sleep, they can lay on their mat quietly and they fall asleep but that’s for the little kids but older they can sleep or not sleep. If they don’t want to sleep, they can do their homework or S1 give them things to work on. S1 denied yelling at children to nap and denied yelling overall, S1 speaks loudly to get children’s attention but not in a harsh tone. S2 denied yelling at children and denied observing S1 yell at children. LPA attempted to interview 3 children, but the children did not qualify for interviews. Four of four parents interviewed made no disclosures regarding the allegations.
During the inspection, LPA Valdez Santana did not observe staff speaking in harsh tones to the children. Additionally, there is a room (not entirely enclosed that has tables for older children to do table work should they decide not to nap. During the course of the investigation LPA obtained a copy of the Children's Roster.
Based on LPA’s interviews and record review, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegations of Staff forced children to nap and Staff yelled at children when they did not take a nap. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted, and report was reviewed and discussed with Licensee, Anya Nanayakkara. Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. The facility representative was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. The facility was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 12/15) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. The phone translation service “Interpreting Service” was used during today’s visit. Page 2 of 2. End of Report.
|