1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 7/22/2024, the LPA interviewed two staff. Staff 2 (S2) stated, “generally, we feed them eggs and fruit. We always include fruit for breakfast.” S2 listed various fruits and added that they also include sausage, cereal, and pancakes and explained that the breakfast varies. S2 continued, “for lunch, we give them cucumber, carrots, and broccoli with rice, chicken, or vegetable soup with meatballs. We take turns. Sometimes I make Colombian food and sometimes [the licensee] makes Mexican food. The menu varies depending on the season. In this season, they like watermelon and berries and not much soups because it’s hot. It varies, but we always include fruit and vegetables. Some children are allergic to foods, so they bring their own lunch and instructions for when and how to feed them.” On 8/30/24, the LPA interviewed the licensee. The licensee stated, “we always feed the children” and listed food cooked or kept in the home to provide the children breakfast, lunch, and snack.
On 8/30/24, the LPA attempted to interview 5 children. Two children qualified for the interview. The two children interviewed listed foods they have eaten in the daycare. C2 said that in the morning they eat strawberries, apples, and orange but their favorite food is the noodles. C5 said they have had pancakes and bananas and eggs for breakfast, and rice and chicken. The rest of the children did not qualify for an interview.
On 7/24/2024, the LPAs called six parents requesting an interview. Two parents were reached and interviewed. None of the parents interviewed expressed any concerns related to the allegations. The rest of the parents were not reachable or did not respond to the Department’s request for comment.
On 7/22/2024, during the initial visit, the LPA observed children eating rice, chicken, and salad. The LPA inspected the food prep area, including the refrigerator. The LPA observed carrots, grapes, blueberries, apples, milk, and gelatine desert. On 8/30/24, the LPA observed the children eating apples and waffles.
Based on the interviews conducted and the LPA’s observations, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Victoria Salazar. The Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. The director was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. The director was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 01/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. First-level appeals should be sent to the regional manager to the address listed above.
|