1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2 of 3
Orange County Childcare Regional Office (RO) received a complaint addressing conduct inimical that Adult’s conduct poses a threat to children in care.
This investigation was assigned to Investigator Hector Quintanar from Investigation Branch (IB) with Department of Social Services. IB Investigator, Quintanar contacted other enforcement agencies who were involved in this investigation. IB Investigator gathered reports from Police Department, Orange County Child Welfare Services, Children Protective Services reports, Orange County Child Abuse Services Team (CAST). IB also conducted pertinent interviews with witnesses involved. IB Investigator Quintanar interviewed a total of 9 adults, and gathered CAST interview reports for 3 qualified children, and other enforcement agencies.
Based on the interviews and information gathered from the above agencies by IB investigator, it was discovered Adult # 1 was arrested due to alleged abuse. On or about October 2021 and other unknown dates, Adult # 1 engaged in conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of either an individual in or receiving services from the facility or the people of the State of California. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, the allegation of “Adult’s conduct poses a threat to children” is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
Type A citation under California Title 22 Regulations Section 102402(a)(3) is cited on LIC9099D.
In reference to allegation of Adult # 1 slapped a child on the hand. IB Investigator, Quintanar interviewed Adults # 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
On 9/30/22, Adult # 5 stated Adult # 1 never took care of the day care children and was not involved with day care.
On 10/18/22, IB interviewed Adult # 1 asking if Adult # 1 disciplined a day care child by slapping child on the hand and Adult # 1 stated this never occurred.
On 11/4/22 IB interviewed Adult # 2 asking if Adult # 1 disciplined a child by slapping on the hand. Adult # 2 stated did not see this incident.
On 11/3/2022 LPA Malek interviewed Adult # 2, 3, and 4 whom they acknowledged not witnessing this incident.
On 11/03/2022, LPA Malek attempted to interview 14 day-care children, 3 of the children were qualified, the rest of the children were non-verbal (2-year-old and under).
Continued on page 3 |