1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 3
On 09/25/2026, LPA contacted five parents via phone call. Three out of five parents were able to be interviewed. Parents interviewed did not divulge any information pertaining to the allegation.
Reporting Party (RP) alleges Facility staff used equipment to confine daycare child. RP mentioned between September 08, 2026, and September 11, 2026, C1 experienced severe behavioral episodes at the facility. RP mentioned A1 reported the child engaged in head banging for approximately 45 minutes. RP stated the child was placed in a crib for time-out and became extremely upset.
During the interview with licensee, licensee mentioned C1 was crying after Labor Day weekend on Tuesday and Wednesday the child was crying even more. The rest of the week, the child was crying more than usual. Licensee mentioned C1 would get picked up if they were crying but then C1 would swing their hands trying to hit. Licensee mentioned If they put C1 on their lap, C1 would intentionally fall to the floor. Licensee stated C1 was placed inside the crib for approximately 10 minutes with A2 present inside the room. Licensee denied C1 banging their head for approximately 45 minutes. Licensee and A1 both stated when a child is crying, they talk to the child, hold the child, and pat their backs.
On 09/25/2026, LPA contacted five parents via phone call. Three out of five parents were able to be interviewed. Parents interviewed did not divulge any information pertaining to the allegation.
Based on interviews with licensee, interviews with parents, and documents reviewed, there was not enough evidence to substantiate the allegations.
The Orange County Childcare Office has investigated the complaint alleging (1) Licensee allowed uncleared adults to provide care and supervision to daycare children, (2) Licensee is not present an adequate amount of time, and (3) Facility staff used equipment to confine daycare child: although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not enough preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
In the areas that were evaluated, no deficiencies were observed of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 at the time of the visit.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with licensee Marina Benson. |