1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On May 1, 2026, the staff #5 (S5) advised C1’s parents that the center allows C1 to finish the two-week trial period, but C1’s parents would need to find another school for C1 after that. C1’s parents were advised by C1’s teacher that C1 grabbed toys from other children.
During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed 5 staff, the reporting party, 5 parents, reviewed the admission agreement, a staff member’s statement, and reviewed pertinent documents. LPA couldn’t interview the child #1 (C1) because C1 was no longer attending the day care since 05/02/2026.
Regarding the allegation of “Staff wrongfully terminated daycare child.”
During the physical plant on 05/07/2026, LPA reviewed the admission agreement. The agreement includes behavior-related conditions for termination, such as a child being at risk of causing serious injury to themselves or others, uncontrollable tantrums or angry outbursts, and ongoing physical or verbal abuse toward staff or other children. It also states that the first two weeks of attendance are considered a trial period for both parties, during which either party may terminate care. LPA reviewed the staff member’s statement, it stated that on April 30, 2026, the staff #1 (S1) observed the child #1 (C1) hit another student in the face twice; and C1 was walking around the classroom taking toys away from other students and pushing them to the floor.
During the staff interview, 5 out of 5 staff denied the allegation of “Staff wrongfully terminated daycare child.” The Staff #1 (S1), the staff #2 (S2), the staff #3 (S3), and the staff #4 (S4) stated that from April 29, 2026, to April 30, 2026, they observed the child #1 (C1) took other children’s toys and threw at the children. S1 stated that C1 hit S1’s knee on April 30, 2026. S2 stated that C1 hit S2’s knee on April 29, 2026. The staff #5 (S5) stated that S5’s responsibility is to protect all the staff and children’s safety. S5 stated they did not terminate C1 on May 1, 2026, but attempted to discuss the behavioral concerns with C1’s authorized representatives, who were uncooperative. S5 stated that they did not terminate C1 on May 1, 2026, but attempted to discuss the behavioral concerns with C1’s authorized representative, who were uncooperative. S5 stated they provided a two-week notice for the family to find alternative care, and the parents chose to remove C1 from the facility immediately. During the parent interview, all 5 interviewed parents did not divulge any information pertaining to the allegation or express any concerns regarding the care of the children.
Page 2 of 3
|