1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 6/3/26 LPA Laird conducted interviews with 3 staff (S1-S3). All staff interviewed stated they had no knowledge of the allegations. All staff interviewed stated they had never observed staff make inappropriate comments in the presence of daycare children. All staff stated they take children to the restroom whenever they ask to go. All staff stated the bathroom is outside of the classroom. Staff stated sometimes children have to wait until a teacher comes to take them to the restroom so they can stay within ratio.
On 8/19/26 and 8/25/26 LPA Laird conducted interviews with 3 witnesses (W1-W3). Of those interviewed, two witnesses stated they had knowledge of the allegations. Two witnesses stated they had heard staff make inappropriate comments in the presence of daycare children. Both witnesses stated they were not sure if the other children had heard the comments and no children appeared upset by the comments made. Two witnesses stated they had observed staff make children wait to use the restroom resulting in the children having accidents. All witnesses stated the bathroom is outside of the classroom and staff will make children wait until another teacher is available to take them to the bathroom. All witnesses denied hearing staff yell at children.
On 9/2/26 LPA Laird conducted interviews with 2 children (C1-C2). Both children stated they liked their school. One child stated they use the "potty" and go to the bathroom.
On 9/2/26 LPA Laird observed the classroom. LPA Laird observed staff interacting with children in a positive manner. LPA Laird did not observe staff speaking inappropriately towards children. LPA Laird observed children actively participating in play with both peers and teachers.
Based on interviews and observations, LPA Laird determined there is insufficient evidence at this time to determine whether or not the allegations occurred.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with director, Francine Mendenhall. Appeal rights were provided.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
|