1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Five parents (P1 – P5) were interviewed on 05/19/26, 08/13/26, and 08/14/26 and P1 – P4 had no knowledge of the allegation stating that they were unaware of staff failing to put pull ups on C1 at nap time. P5 had knowledge of the allegation stating that the has been multiple occasions were staff have failed to put on C1’s pull up at nap time.
One Witness (W1) was interviewed on 08/14/26 and had no knowledge of the allegations stating that W1 was unaware of staff failing to put pull ups on child C1 at nap time.
Three Children (C1 -C3) were interviewed on 05/21/26 and C1 – C3 had no knowledge of the allegation.
On 05/21/26 LPA reviewed evidence that confirmed that staff failed to put a pull up on C1 during nap time on the date of 05/18/26.
During the investigation LPA Sims reviewed evidence, conducted interviews with Licensee, Staff, witness, Children and Parents and the evidence and interviews supported the allegations.
Based on the evidence obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the licensee Wendy Waugh. Appeal rights were provided.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |