Countryhill Montessori
Inspection history
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division| Date | Kind | Outcome as recorded | Violations | Official record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2026 | Case Management: Deficiencies | 1 Type B deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Aug 14, 2026 | Complaint | Substantiated: Facility left a child unattended for a period of time | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Mar 4, 2025 | POC | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jan 27, 2025 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| May 6, 2024 | POC | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Apr 23, 2024 | Complaint | Substantiated: Facility staff did not isolate children with clear signs of illness · 1 deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Jan 30, 2024 | Complaint | Unsubstantiated | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jan 30, 2024 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Sep 20, 2023 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jul 31, 2023 | Complaint | Substantiated: Children are not adequately supervised by staff | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| May 9, 2023 | Complaint | Substantiated: Staff do not ensure a safe and healthful environment by inappropriately handling a daycare child roughly | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Dec 12, 2022 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Sep 15, 2022 | Case Management: Deficiencies | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Aug 18, 2022 | POC | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Aug 9, 2022 | POC | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Aug 4, 2022 | Complaint | Substantiated: Staff handled daycare child in a rough manner | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Aug 4, 2022 | Case Management: Deficiencies | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jul 6, 2022 | Office | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jun 8, 2022 | Complaint | Substantiated: Staff did not prevent inappropriate behavior between children; Licensee is operating over ratio; Unqualified staff are supervising children | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jun 8, 2022 | Complaint | Substantiated: Staff are not adequately supervising day care children; Staff are not meeting day care child's diapering needs | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jun 8, 2022 | Complaint | Substantiated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jun 8, 2022 | Case Management: Deficiencies | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| May 23, 2022 | Case Management: Deficiencies | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| May 10, 2022 | Complaint | Substantiated: Unqualified staff providing supervision to day care children; Staff not allowing parents to visit daycare children; Facility operating out of ratio | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Apr 22, 2022 | POC | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Apr 4, 2022 | Case Management: Deficiencies | 1 Type A deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Feb 14, 2022 | Case Management: Deficiencies | 1 Type A deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Feb 10, 2022 | Office | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Feb 2, 2022 | Complaint | Substantiated: Unqualified staff alone with children · 1 deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Feb 2, 2022 | Case Management: Deficiencies | 2 Type A deficiencies cited | 2 | Official report · PDF |
| Jan 5, 2022 | Case Management: Deficiencies | 3 Type A · 1 Type B deficiencies cited | 4 | Official report · PDF |
| Oct 19, 2021 | POC | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Oct 14, 2021 | Complaint | Unsubstantiated | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Oct 14, 2021 | Complaint | Unsubstantiated | 0 | Official report · PDF |
Violations
Text reproduced verbatim · California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing DivisionNearly every licensed provider accumulates some. A missing signature and an unlocked medicine cabinet are both “violations”, and they are not the same thing. Look at the class, the pattern over time and how quickly it was corrected — not the count alone.
Class is our grouping of the state’s own weights, reviewed per state. The agency’s own label is always shown beside it.
“based on interview, and record review, Director did not comply with the section cited above as an incident on 8/5/26 was not reported to the dept. the next working day, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on interviews, and record review, the licensee did not isolate a child with signs of illness, which poses an immediate risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of the children in care”
“Based on observations Staff Alexandria Frazier, [name withheld], and Elaheh Salehi were present at the facility without a fingerprint clearance. This poses an immediate risk to the health and safety of children in care.”
“Based on observations Staff (S1) was supervising children on the play yard during a census conducted. Staff was still pending in Guardian fingerprint system and not yet cleared. This poses an immediate risk to the health and safety of children in care.”
“through observation and interviews it was discovered that the facility was using aides to supervise awake children without a qualified staff present.”
“Two staff were observed working in the facility today supervising children and used in ratio. (see LIC811 for name). The two staff did not have a criminal record clearance. This an immediate risk to the health and safety of children in care. Civil Penalties are assessed in the amount of $500.”
“LPA [name withheld] observed one staff supervising napping preschool children putting the room over ratio.”
“S2 was observed working in the facility today supervising children and used in ratio. LPA conduced a file review and Guardian search and it was determined a fingerprint clearance was not located for S2. (see LIC811 for name). S2 has been employed since 9/27/21. This is an immediate risk to the health and safety of children in care. Civil Penalties are assessed in the amount of $500.”
“LPA observed S1 in the toddler room supervising toddlers. This poses an immediate risk to the health and safety of children in care.”
“the Redwood classroom had children supervised by an aide (S2) and a FQT (S3). LPA observed an aide (S4) and a FQT (S1) supervising children on the playground. Both the classroom and the playground were out of ratio. This poses a risk to the health and safety of children in care if not corrected.”
“S1 was observed supervisign toddlers ages 18-36 months in the toddler room. S1 does not have infant units. This poses a potential health and safety risk to children in care.”
Nearby providers
0.2 mi · Child-care center · 0 violationsSunrise State Preschool
0.3 mi · Child-care center · 0 violationsCitrus Heights Montessori
0.5 mi · Child-care center · 1 violationDiscovery Tree Schools
0.6 mi · Child-care center · 0 violationsDiscovery Tree School-Tad Lane
0.6 mi · Child-care center · 0 violations