Ehrlich, Evelina
Inspection history
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division| Date | Kind | Outcome as recorded | Violations | Official record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Mar 19, 2024 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Apr 11, 2023 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Apr 25, 2022 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Feb 9, 2022 | Complaint | Substantiated: Facility is not following COVID-19 guidelines · 1 deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Jan 14, 2022 | POC | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jan 5, 2022 | Case Management: Deficiencies | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
Violations
Text reproduced verbatim · California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing DivisionNearly every licensed provider accumulates some. A missing signature and an unlocked medicine cabinet are both “violations”, and they are not the same thing. Look at the class, the pattern over time and how quickly it was corrected — not the count alone.
Class is our grouping of the state’s own weights, reviewed per state. The agency’s own label is always shown beside it.
“Based on observation and interviews conducted, the staff of the facility did not ensure the personal rights of persons in care to safe and healthful accommodations and engaged in conduct inimical to the health, welfare, and safety of persons in care. Staff did not wear face coverings while in the facility, as required by the CA Dept. of Public Health Guidance on the Use of Face Coverings in a child care facility. This poses a potential risk to children in care.”