Spielman, Tanya Family Child Care
Inspection history
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division| Date | Kind | Outcome as recorded | Violations | Official record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Mar 12, 2026 | Case Management: Other | 1 Type A deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Mar 12, 2026 | Complaint | Substantiated: Licensee is not ensuring that day care children are provided a safe environment while in care · 1 deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Jul 15, 2025 | Case Management: Incident | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Nov 26, 2024 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Oct 24, 2024 | Complaint | Unsubstantiated | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Oct 24, 2024 | Complaint | Unsubstantiated · 1 deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Jan 6, 2023 | Complaint | Substantiated: Facility is operating over capacity · 1 deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Apr 28, 2022 | POC | 1 Type B deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Apr 7, 2022 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
Violations
Text reproduced verbatim · California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing DivisionNearly every licensed provider accumulates some. A missing signature and an unlocked medicine cabinet are both “violations”, and they are not the same thing. Look at the class, the pattern over time and how quickly it was corrected — not the count alone.
Class is our grouping of the state’s own weights, reviewed per state. The agency’s own label is always shown beside it.
“Based on LPA interviews and Licensee interview, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Based on Licensee interview, it was revealed that A1 resided in the FCCH. In addition, interviews conducted for a separate complaint corroborated seeing A1 on the premises of the FCCH which poses/posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on LPA interviews, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above. It was revealed that on more than one occasion A1 smoked on the premises of the FCCH while daycare children were present; therefore, Licensee did not provide a safe environment for daycare children which poses/posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
“Based on video footage and staff interview. Staff was seen inappropriately disciplining a day care child, (child #1) by holding down child as a form of discipline. Which posed a potential threat to the health, safety, or personal rights of children.”
“Based on observation, there were children present, including four infants, seven preschool aged and seven school aged, which posed a potential threat to the health, safety, or personal rights of children. This is also a repeat violation.”
“Based on observation, there were children present, including four infants, and no children age six, which posed a potentiatl threat to the health, safety, or personal rights of children.”
Nearby providers
Family day-care home · 0 violationsAghoustin, Fatemeh Family Child Care
Family day-care home · 0 violationsAlvaji, Angelica Family Child Care
Family day-care home · 0 violationsBaghdasarian, Rashel Family Child Care
Family day-care home · 0 violationsBetashoor, Rada & Vania Family Child Care
Family day-care home · 0 violations