Academy Christian School
Inspection history
Source: Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Child Care RegulationRecords held from Sep 1, 2021 onward. Earlier visits may exist in the agency’s own files.
| Date | Kind | Outcome as recorded | Violations | Official record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2026 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Dec 30, 2025 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Dec 16, 2025 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Report | Deficiencies cited | 3 | Agency record |
| Jul 31, 2025 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Feb 28, 2025 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 1 | Agency record |
| Feb 27, 2025 | Report | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Jan 22, 2025 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Oct 22, 2024 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 4 | Agency record |
| Nov 29, 2023 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Nov 16, 2023 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 5 | Agency record |
| Jul 25, 2023 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Jul 14, 2023 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Mar 16, 2023 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Mar 15, 2023 | Report | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Jan 19, 2023 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 2 | Agency record |
| Jan 5, 2023 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Mar 9, 2022 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 2 | Agency record |
| Jan 5, 2022 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 7 | Agency record |
| Jan 3, 2022 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Dec 1, 2021 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Nov 19, 2021 | Report | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
| Nov 17, 2021 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 3 | Agency record |
| Nov 15, 2021 | Inspection | Deficiencies cited | 3 | Agency record |
| Nov 4, 2021 | Inspection | No deficiencies cited | 3 | Agency record |
| Jul 16, 2021 no longer in the state’s current file | Report | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Agency record |
Violations
Text reproduced verbatim · Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Child Care RegulationNearly every licensed provider accumulates some. A missing signature and an unlocked medicine cabinet are both “violations”, and they are not the same thing. Look at the class, the pattern over time and how quickly it was corrected — not the count alone.
Class is our grouping of the state’s own weights, reviewed per state. The agency’s own label is always shown beside it.
“A child was pulled through the hallway of the operation by the previous director.”
“The operation failed to notify parents of less serious injuries when the parents pick up their children from the child-care center.”
“The previous director failed to comply with standards by conducting prohibited punishments and not ensuring parents were notified according to standards.”
“Operation allowed staff member to be present at the operation without the correct background check for a staff worker present with children. Caregiver was present with children throughout the operation.”
“Director did not have attendance records or time sheets listing all days and hours worked.”
“Liability Insurance was not made available during inspection.”
“Operation did not have an annual Environmental Health inspection.”
“Operation did not have an annual Fire inspection.”
“Food allergy emergency plan was not signed by a parent.”
“One caregiver was over ratio with 6 infants. Infant room had a specified age 14 months”
“Operation has not tested carbon monoxide detection system monthly.”
“Operation did not conduct a monthly drill in the month of October.”
“Operational policies were not updated to the new standards.”
“At the time of inspection, 1 child with a noted food allergy did not have a food allergy plan on file.”
“At the time of inspection, the annual fire inspection had not been conducted for 2022. The last fire inspection conducted was dated 6/7/21.”
“Storage space was not clearly labeled with the child s name, a photograph of the child, or other symbol the child recognizes as his own.”
“Children observed walking around with no activities and not enough outdoor toys for children to play with.”
“18-24 month old classroom did not have children alllergies posted.”
“Lysol bottle was in the children's bathroom inside a cabinet unlocked and open.”
“There were no storage for each child's belongs and storage area was not labeled for each child.”
“Water was not served or offer during snack in the infant room.”
“Children ages 18-24 months and 2 years old were observed crawling under a play structure designed for ages 3 and up.”
“Operation does not have food allergy emergency plan for an infant and toddler.”
“Children observed walking around with no activities and outdoor toys were not brought outside for children to play with”
“A child was left outside for about 1-2 minutes on the playground.”
“The operation violated conditions listed on the employee's provisional eligibility letter. The employee was the sole caregiver and was left alone with a group of children.”
“Permit holder allowed caregiver to be the primary caregiver supervising children alone which is against the caregiver's provisional status.”
“Director/ caregiver allowed an infant to sleep in a restrictive device (bouncer).”
“One caregiver was supervising 6 infants in the age ratio 0-11 months. One caregiver was supervising 17 toddlers in the age ratio 18-24 months.”
“Permit holder allowed infant room to be out of ratio a second time and failed to correct the concern regarding ratio.”
“Caregiver was supervising 6 infants in the age ratio 12 -17 months.”
“Permit holder allowed a caregiver to be present with infants directly after being informed by CCR Rep that all caregiver must receive an eligibility letter from BGC unit.”
“An operation allows a person to be present at the operation before receiving notice from the CBCU regarding the person's eligibility.”