Nese Kids Care
Inspection history
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division| Date | Kind | Outcome as recorded | Violations | Official record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | Complaint | Unsubstantiated | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Aug 26, 2026 | Complaint | Unsubstantiated | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jul 16, 2026 | Complaint | Substantiated: Staff are not properly attending to child needs; Staff are not properly supervising children · 1 deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Jul 15, 2026 | Complaint | Unsubstantiated | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Complaint | Unsubstantiated | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jun 9, 2026 | Complaint | Unsubstantiated | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Complaint | Substantiated: Staff yell at children in care; Staff do not treat children with dignity and respect · 1 deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| May 28, 2026 | Case Management: Deficiencies | 1 Type B deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| May 28, 2026 | Complaint | Substantiated: Staff fed infant incorrect bottle; Facility is not properly reporting incidents · 2 deficiencies cited | 2 | Official report · PDF |
| May 5, 2026 | Case Management: Deficiencies | 1 Type A deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Case Management: Deficiencies | 1 Type B deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Complaint | Substantiated: Facility is operating beyond the conditions of their license · 1 deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Mar 25, 2026 | Case Management: Other | 1 Type B deficiency cited | 1 | Official report · PDF |
| Aug 13, 2025 | Prelicensing | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
| Jul 3, 2025 | Office | No deficiencies cited | 0 | Official report · PDF |
Violations
Text reproduced verbatim · California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing DivisionNearly every licensed provider accumulates some. A missing signature and an unlocked medicine cabinet are both “violations”, and they are not the same thing. Look at the class, the pattern over time and how quickly it was corrected — not the count alone.
Class is our grouping of the state’s own weights, reviewed per state. The agency’s own label is always shown beside it.
“More than 50% of people interviewed disclosed that children’s toileting needs were not being met and that there was supervision concerns due to all the changes in staff.”
“Based on LPA interviews conducted with staff, parents, children and third party interviews, it was determined that staff engaged in conduct that included yelling at children and treating them with disrespect. Additionally, one incident of improper physical handling of a child was directly observed. These actions pose a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care.”
“Based on LPA's observation and staff interviews, Room was out of ratio with infants and staff which poses a potential risk for the health, safety and/or personal rights risk for the children in care.”
“On 3/18/2026 an incident occurred where an infant was fed another infant's bottle with breatsmilk, and the incident was not reported to licensing and an Unusual Incident Report LIC 624 was not received. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to the children in care.”
“On 3/18/2026 an incident occurred where an infant was fed another infant's bottle with breatsmilk. Per documentation and staff interviews it was found that the infant was given the wrong bottle. It is unsure if the infant drank the breastmilk. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to the children in care.”
“Based on file review and observations, a staff member was found working directly with children without a fingerprint clearance in classroom 2, this poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk of children in care.”
“... Based on LPA's observations during inspection, infants were left alone with one Fully Qualified teacher. Three infants were observed napping and fully awake in the process of being fed which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to children in care.”
“... Based on LPA's observation and staff interviews, Room #4 is being used for the infant program (ages 12-18 months) and Room #4 has not been approved by licensing which is a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to children in care.”
“... Based on LPA's observation and interview with Director, Room #4 is being used for the infant program (ages 12-18 months) and Room #4 has not been approved by licensing or the Fire Department for the infant group which is a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to children in care.”
Nearby providers
0.5 mi · Child-care center · 7 violationsLearning Jungle Mission Valley
0.5 mi · Child-care center · 3 violationsAspen Leaf Preschool - University Heights
0.6 mi · Child-care center · 0 violationsAspen Leaf Nursery - University Heights
0.6 mi · Child-care center · 0 violationsLa Petite Etoile 360 Preschool
0.6 mi · Child-care center · 1 violation